Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1038320230200010028
º¸°ÇÀÇ·á±³À°Æò°¡
2023 Volume.20 No. 1 p.28 ~ p.28
Efficacy and limitations of ChatGPT as a biostatistical problem-solving tool in medical education: a descriptive study
Aleksandra Ignjatovic

Lazar Stevanovic
Abstract
Purpose : This study aimed to assess the performance of ChatGPT (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4) as a study tool in solving biostatistical problems and to identify any potential drawbacks that might arise from using ChatGPT in medical education, particularly in solving practical biostatistical problems.

Methods : ChatGPT was tested to evaluate its ability to solve biostatistical problems from the Handbook of Medical Statistics by Peacock and Peacock in this descriptive study. Tables from the problems were transformed into textual questions. Ten biostatistical problems were randomly chosen and used as text-based input for conversation with ChatGPT (versions 3.5 and 4).

Results : GPT-3.5 solved five practical problems in the first attempt, related to categorical data, cross-sectional study, measuring reliability, probability properties, and the t-test. GPT-3.5 failed to provide correct answers regarding ANOVA, the chi-square test, and sample size within 3 attempts. GPT-4 also solved a task related to the confidence interval in the first attempt and solved all questions within 3 attempts, with precise guidance and monitoring.

Conclusion : The assessment of both versions of ChatGPT performance in 10 biostatistical problems revealed that GPT-3.5 and 4¡¯s performance was below average, with correct response rates of 5 and 6 out of 10 on the first attempt. GPT-4 succeeded in providing all correct answers within 3 attempts. These findings indicate that students must be aware that this tool, even when providing and calculating different statistical analyses, can be wrong, and they should be aware of ChatGPT¡¯s limitations and be careful when incorporating this model into medical education.
KEYWORD
Artificial intelligence, Biostatistics, Medical education, Reproducibility of results
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information